Wednesday, 22 July 2015

inorganic chemistry - Why do XeO and XeF8 not exist?


Since Neil Bartlett's 1962 discovery that xenon was capable of forming chemical compounds, a large number of xenon compounds have been discovered and described. Almost all known xenon compounds contain the electronegative atoms fluorine or oxygen. The oxidation state of xenon in its compounds is generally +2, +4, +6, or +8.


Xenon is known to form three fluorides: XeFXn(n=2,4,6) where the oxidation states of xenon are +2, +4, and +6. XeFX8 is not known to exist even though the oxidation state would be +8. Why is this so? Could it possibly be due to the fact that 8 fluorine atoms can't fit around a xenon atom?


Xenon is known to form three oxides: XeOXn(n=2,3,4) where the oxidation states of xenon is +4, +6, and +8. XeOX2 was not known until 2011. Why did it take so long to be discovered? Moreover, the lowest oxide of xenon XeO is not known though the oxidation state of xenon would be +2. Why?



Answer




XeFX8 is not known to exist though O.N is +8. Why is this so?



At least 2 compounds have been reported that contain the XeFX8X2 unit. See, for example:




  • (NOX+)X2[XeFX8]X2 (reference)

  • Metal salts of the form (MX+)X2[XeFX8]X2 where M is a metal salt such as Cs,Rb (see the above reference) or Na (see p. 62 in Advances in Inorganic Chemistry, Volume 46, A. G. Sykes editor; link


The XeFX8 portion of the molecules approximates a square-antiprism geometry.


enter image description here


(image source)



the lowest oxide of xenon XeO is not known though O.N is +2. Why?



Perhaps the molecule is unstable, favoring disproportionation to other xenon oxides plus oxygen. For example, Andreas Hermann and Peter Schwerdtfeger suggest the following pathway at high pressure:



3XeOXeX3OX2+12OX2


The authors go on to note "we do not find XeO to be stable at any pressure" (link to full paper).


Edit: See orthocresol's comment below. He argues that at ambient pressure the following decomposition pathway might be more likely:


XeOXe+12OX2


No comments:

Post a Comment

readings - Appending 内 to a company name is read ない or うち?

For example, if I say マイクロソフト内のパートナーシップは強いです, is the 内 here read as うち or ない? Answer 「内」 in the form: 「Proper Noun + 内」 is always read 「ない...