This answer cites the Ralbag as interpreting a (critical-to-the-question) vav prefix on a verb as "or". I've heard before that a vav prefix is not always "and" and can be "or" or even "but". Is there any grammatical rule by which we can tell when to read it which way, or do all the non-"and" readings always arise from judgments about what would make most sense to the interpreter? Do Chazal generally agree on how any given vav is translated, making it received tradition and there are no explicit rules?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
readings - Appending 内 to a company name is read ない or うち?
For example, if I say マイクロソフト内のパートナーシップは強いです, is the 内 here read as うち or ない? Answer 「内」 in the form: 「Proper Noun + 内」 is always read 「ない...
-
Sulfur reacts with sodium hydroxide in the following way: $\ce{3S + 6NaOH->2Na_2S + Na_2SO_3 + 3H_2O}$ It is a disproportionation reactio...
-
I found a surprising claim from a conservative Christian web site about halacha and relations with children. Is what they say actually true...
-
What is the difference between べんきょう する and べんきょうを する? Answer 勉強{べんきょう}する is one verb. 勉強をする is a phrase. They don't seem to have any ...
-
I recently encountered a DSP system which did some internal upsampling via zero padding. Expecting zero-order-hold, I was surprised to find ...
No comments:
Post a Comment