As a follow-up to my answer here, I'd like to ask what exactly does it mean for a wavefunction to "respect the symmetry" of the system.
The original context is: immediately after ionisation of CHX4, the wavefunction of CHX4X+(Td) cannot be adequately described by removal of an electron from an sp3-type hybrid orbital, as the resulting Slater determinant |ϕ1ϕ2ϕ3ϕ4¯ϕ1¯ϕ2¯ϕ3| does not reflect the tetrahedral symmetry of the system immediately after ionisation (ϕi being the four hybrid orbitals).
Intuitively, it is clear that this is related to the fact that the four C–H bonds must be equivalent. Mathematically, how is this formalised, i.e. what is the criterion that the wavefunction must obey?
As a side question, how does the criterion above apply to a boron atom, for example? Is the wavefunction 1s22s22p1x acceptable on symmetry grounds? My gut feeling is that it's not (because the electron density needs to be spherically symmetric?), but I might really be overthinking this.
No comments:
Post a Comment