Friday, 14 August 2015

Why is the DFT used for spectrograms rather than the DCT?


Related to Could a DCT be used for an audio magnitude spectrum rather than DFT?, but more on the (audio) spectrogram side of things


I've been reading about the DCT (such as from here) and it seemingly provides quite a few advantages over the DFT such as having more frequency bins for the same number of samples and better power compaction, which sounds useful for signal analysis.


Yet all the programs I've used that have spectrograms seems to use the (magnitude of) DFT rather than DCT. Why is that? Is there something bad or "missing" from the DCT that is important for spectrograms?



(Note: I already understand the benefits of the DCT for compression, and this question is about audio (or other time-displacement) signals, so please avoid focusing too much on compression or images)




No comments:

Post a Comment

readings - Appending 内 to a company name is read ない or うち?

For example, if I say マイクロソフト内のパートナーシップは強いです, is the 内 here read as うち or ない? Answer 「内」 in the form: 「Proper Noun + 内」 is always read 「ない...