Thursday, 24 November 2016

organic chemistry - Is the compound CH2(OH)(ONa) possible?


I was just pondering about the reaction mechanism of Cannizzaro reaction.


HX2CX+OX+OHXHX2C(OH)OX


HCHO+HX2C(OH)OXHX3COX+HCOOH


HX3COX+HCOOHHCOOX+HX3COH


I wondered why in 2nd step instead of receiving HX from HX2C(OH)OX; HX2CX+OX wouldn't react with NaOH to form HX2C(OH)ONa.


I don't think this compound will be able to exist. But don't know why! Everything seems right about it.



Answer




Of course, you shouldn’t start from HX2CX+OX unless you note that it is a mesomeric form of HX2C=O — the more relevant mesmeric structure.


The mechanism as you wrote it and as it is typically written is given without any counterion, i.e. using just OHX and not NaOH. You could instead write the mechanism using a counterion for OHXNaX+, which would result in the first step being:


HX2C=O+NaOHHX2C(ONa)(OH)


This is essentially the compound you are suggesting. Hence it exists, but it is a minor constituent of the overall solution. It’s not part of the second step, it is the first step. For the second step to happen, you need another molecule of HX2C=O, which has not yet reacted to the geminal diolate HX2C(ONa)(OH).


See this scheme for the transition state of the Cannizzaro reaction and where HX2C(ONa)(OH) comes into play:


Mechanism of addition and transitino state


No comments:

Post a Comment

readings - Appending 内 to a company name is read ない or うち?

For example, if I say マイクロソフト内のパートナーシップは強いです, is the 内 here read as うち or ない? Answer 「内」 in the form: 「Proper Noun + 内」 is always read 「ない...