I was just pondering about the reaction mechanism of Cannizzaro reaction.
HX2CX+−OX−+OHX−⟶HX2C(OH)OX−
HCHO+HX2C(OH)OX−⟶HX3COX−+HCOOH
HX3COX−+HCOOH⟶HCOOX−+HX3COH
I wondered why in 2nd step instead of receiving HX− from HX2C(OH)OX−; HX2CX+−OX− wouldn't react with NaOH to form HX2C(OH)ONa.
I don't think this compound will be able to exist. But don't know why! Everything seems right about it.
Answer
Of course, you shouldn’t start from HX2CX+−OX− unless you note that it is a mesomeric form of HX2C=O — the more relevant mesmeric structure.
The mechanism as you wrote it and as it is typically written is given without any counterion, i.e. using just OHX− and not NaOH. You could instead write the mechanism using a counterion for OHX− — NaX+, which would result in the first step being:
HX2C=O+NaOH⟶HX2C(ONa)(OH)
This is essentially the compound you are suggesting. Hence it exists, but it is a minor constituent of the overall solution. It’s not part of the second step, it is the first step. For the second step to happen, you need another molecule of HX2C=O, which has not yet reacted to the geminal diolate HX2C(ONa)(OH).
See this scheme for the transition state of the Cannizzaro reaction and where HX2C(ONa)(OH) comes into play:
No comments:
Post a Comment