Monday, 25 July 2016

nuances - What is the correct usage of 承知しました, 了解です and かしこ まりました, the more formal forms of 分かる?


At work, it is wrong to simply say 分かる to say that you understand something. In what situation should I opt to use one of the previously mentioned forms?



Answer



かしこまりました is by far the most formal, and is a humble form (謙遜語). It says that you are inferior to the listener. Most specifically this should be used to interface with customers (hence why wait staff at a restaurant may say it).



承知しました is polite (〜します), but not humble. It is also appropriate to use with customers or superiors.


了解です is also polite in form, and is not humble, but has a certain curt feeling to it (this could be from its usage by the armed services as "Roger"). Informally friends and family often say/text 了解 (without the です) in a context where they want to say "Yep, got it".


The difference between the latter 2 is nuance, I suppose. Both seem to translate as "I acknowledge and understand". My gut feeling having worked in a Japanese office is that 了解です, while polite, isn't formal enough for customers. 承知 is better for customers or superiors.


No comments:

Post a Comment

readings - Appending 内 to a company name is read ない or うち?

For example, if I say マイクロソフト内のパートナーシップは強いです, is the 内 here read as うち or ない? Answer 「内」 in the form: 「Proper Noun + 内」 is always read 「ない...