Saturday, 30 April 2016

spectroscopy - Is carbon dioxide IR inactive?



I am told that carbon dioxide is IR inactive.


This somehow strikes me as untrue or at best oversimplified, because yes, it is overall symmetrical, but can't COX2 be induced to show asymmetric stretching patterns?


So this leads me to the question: in a simplified presentation of IR, why might someone present symmetrical, non-polar molecules as IR "inactive"? Could we be relying on a simpler definition of IR inactive?



Answer




I am told that carbon dioxide is IR inactive.



You're right, that's not true. Since carbon dioxide is linear it has 3n5=4 vibrations and they are pictured below.


enter image description here




  • The symmetric stretch does not result in a change (of the initially zero dipole moment), so it is ir-inactive.

  • The asymmetric stretch does result in a change in dipole moment so it is ir-active.

  • The bend also results in a change in dipole moment so it too is ir-active.


We expected 4 vibrations and I've only listed 3. This is because the "bend" (let's start by placing the molecule along the x-axis) can occur in the y direction and the z direction. But these two motions are the same, just deforming in different directions, the bend is said to be degenerate, accounting for the "fourth" vibration.


To sum up, carbon dioxide has 2 ir-active vibrations.


Edit - response to example added (question d) by OP


Question d is incorrect. Either the author 1) inadvertently switched the column headings (IR active, IR inactive) or 2) meant to use some molecule other than carbon dioxide.


The first 3 rules you learn for interpreting IR and Raman spectra are




  • The number of molecular vibrational modes equals 3n-6 (3n-5 for linear molecules), where n is the number of atoms.

  • An ir active band will be observed if a vibration results in a change of the dipole moment. The initial dipole moment in the molecule's equilibrium geometry can be zero; all you need is a change. The terms "polar" and "non-polar" can be confusing, they often mean different things to different people. Leave "polar" out of the criteria for ir activity and stick with dipole moment, it is a much better understood term.

  • the rule of mutual exclusion, it states that, for centrosymmetric molecules (molecules with a center of symmetry, like carbon dioxide), vibrations that are IR active are Raman inactive, and vice versa. So for carbon dioxide there is 1 Raman band and two IR bands.


Here's a link to a recent SE Chem question: How can I deduce the linearity of XeF2 from the IR spectrum? where these rules were used to determine the structure of a molecule.


No comments:

Post a Comment

readings - Appending 内 to a company name is read ない or うち?

For example, if I say マイクロソフト内のパートナーシップは強いです, is the 内 here read as うち or ない? Answer 「内」 in the form: 「Proper Noun + 内」 is always read 「ない...