Tuesday 26 April 2016

everyday chemistry - Does milk drinking prevent long-term chemical poisoning?


I have heard some rumors that drinking milk prevents chemical poisoning. I have done a bit research and some sources confirm that.




Corrosive Poisons


The best first aid is to dilute the poison as quickly as possible. For acids or alkalis (bases), give the patient water or preferably milk or ice cream — one (1) cup for victims under five (5) years; or one (1) to two (2) glasses for patients over five (5) years. Milk or ice cream is better than water because it dilutes and helps neutralize the poison. Water only dilutes the poison. Cornell University



In Case of Poison Ingestion: Drink Milk?


As @Jan pointed out in the case of chemical poisoning the paramedics are immediately called.


So my question is, does milk helps chemical poisoning, e.g., for people that daily work with chemicals or are working in chemical facilities (working with or be in the presence of $\ce{HCl}$, $\ce{HF}$, $\ce{NaOH}$, $\ce{HNO3}$, $\ce{H3PO4}$, etc.)? Or what would be beneficial? And I mean long-term exposure and not immediately threat to life or health.



Answer



This post only concerns chronic poisoning, i.e. exposure to a harmful chemical in low amounts for an extended period of time. The answer is not applicable to acute poisoning; in that case a doctor should immediately be called.


Basically there are three types of chemicals that have a harmfulness threshold to which one can be exposed over extended periods of time.


Type one includes substances such as mercury that are primarily aggregated in the body rather than excreted. In rare cases, drinking milk may enhance excretion thereby decontaminating the body. I haven’t heard of any such examples, though, and I would assume it to be a very rare case so neglegible.



Type two includes those substances that the body can actually metabolise to harmless products. This would include most protein poisons. However, the metabolism shouldn’t be enhanced by drinking milk so it will likely have a non-effect.


Type three includes those that, while they aren’t metabolised, just don’t do enough damage at low concentrations. That would basically include your list of acidic and basic substances but also non-aggregating metals at low concentrations. For these, excretion is not significantly enhanced or reduced by drinking milk so again no effect is expected.


Comparing the acute exposure to acids to the chronic one, in the former giving a person milk to drink is actively encouraged. This is because milk contains a lot of proteins that can act as buffers, increasing the body’s buffering potential and reducing the effects of the acid. The body does have more than enough buffering capabilities to cope with chronic cases though, so even there regularly drinking milk would not help.


Tl;dr: Milk is a great drink but cannot act as a type of preventive antidote.


No comments:

Post a Comment

readings - Appending 内 to a company name is read ない or うち?

For example, if I say マイクロソフト内のパートナーシップは強いです, is the 内 here read as うち or ない? Answer 「内」 in the form: 「Proper Noun + 内」 is always read 「ない...