Sunday, 10 January 2016

What is the oxidizing agent for Fe in the following redox reaction?


Redox: Fe+2HClFeClX2+HX2


Oxidation: FeFeX2++2eX


Reduction: 2HX++2eXHX2


The HCl and HX2 are formed by covalent bonds. The FeClX2 forms an ionic bond. The iron actually loses 2 electrons to the two chlorines, so the oxidation equation makes sense to me. But the hydrogen is always in a covalent bond with the chlorine or another hydrogen atom, it is always sharing electrons, never losing or gaining, so the reduction equation doesn't make sense to me. When the H is bonded with the Cl, it "has" two electrons because it is sharing a pair with the Cl. After the reaction, when the H is bonded with another H, it still "has" two electrons because it is sharing a pair with another H, so no electron was gained as the reduction equation indicates.



After a little a thinking I came up with an answer, which raised even more questions:


Since the covalent bond between the H and the Cl is a polar bond and it behaves more like an ionic compound because of that, when HCl is dissolved in water, the H will lose an electron to the Cl, making HX+ and ClX ions, so there is no covalent bond when HCl is in water. The HX+ ions can gain one electron and then make a covalent bond with each other, making HX2 molecules.


But what about the ClX ions in the solution? they have already formed an octet in their outer shell by getting an electron off the hydrogen when they got separated, so they are satisfied. Then why Fe atoms oxidize? who is the oxidizing agent? The HX2 molecules are already comfortable with their covalent bond, and the ClX ions are also satisfied with their octet.


I'm very confused.



Answer



To answer your initial question:


The oxidizing agent is the reagent that gets reduced. Conversely: The reducing agent is the reagent that gets oxidized.


Now, addressing your trouble with the concept: You are right that hydrochloric acid is found in the ionic form when in aqueous solution, so: HClHX2OHX++ClX


Now we have the reagent that gets reduced, which is the proton. Together with another proton and two electrons, they form hydrogen gas that then evolves from the solution: 2HX++2eXHX2

This is basically our electron sink, because that's where they go "to die", i.e. to vanish from our solution.


But where do these electrons come from? Well, we have two potential electron donors here: The chloride anion and the iron. Which one will give up his electrons more easily?



The answer we already know: Iron.


Why? Because as you correctly stated, the chloride anion has all the shells filled and is very happy because of that filled octet state. So the energy to get out an electron from it is higher than to rip it away from an unsuspecting iron atom.1) FeX0FeX++eXFeX2++2eX


The electrons then vanish (because of the formation of hydrogen, remember?) which leaves us with some iron cations and chloride anions. They will then start to mix with each other. Don't judge them, they don't know any better! FeX2++2ClXFeClX2


Since ferric chloride (II) is quite soluble in water, it will most probably not precipitate.




Footnotes:



  1. Actually, you could also compare the standard reduction potentials of the reactions FeFeX2++2eX and ClXClX+eX. The one that has the lower standard reduction potential is the winner (because the energy of a system is always minimized). This is also what you would usually do, but in this example it wasn't necessary because you could get to the solution via chemical concepts.


No comments:

Post a Comment

readings - Appending 内 to a company name is read ない or うち?

For example, if I say マイクロソフト内のパートナーシップは強いです, is the 内 here read as うち or ない? Answer 「内」 in the form: 「Proper Noun + 内」 is always read 「ない...