Saturday, 15 August 2015

physical chemistry - Relation between constant-pressure and constant-volume heat capacities: Cp - Cv = nR


For an ideal gas, we have


CpCV=nR


where
Cp is heat capacity at constant pressure,
CV is heat capacity at constant volume,
n is amount of substance, and
R=NAkB=8.31446261815324 J mol1 K1[source] is the molar gas constant.


How can I prove this?




Answer



The heat capacities are defined as


Cp=(HT)pCV=(UT)V


and since H=U+pV, we have


CpCV=(HT)p(UT)V=(UT)p+((pV)T)p(UT)V


Ordinarily, we have d(pV)=pdV+Vdp, but under conditions of constant pressure dp=0 and so we can write


CpCV=(UT)p+p(VT)p(UT)V


For an ideal gas, V=nRT/p (n being constant throughout this whole discussion - or else nR in the original equation makes no sense!) and so


(VT)p=nRp


Substituting (5) into (4) gives



CpCV=(UT)p(UT)V+nR


At this stage, you have two choices.




The easy way


From the equipartition theorem, the internal energy of an ideal gas is given by


U=(Degrees of freedom2)nRT


The number of degrees of freedom doesn't matter, because it is a constant for any given gas. The important point is that U=U(T), i.e. internal energy is a function of only temperature. Therefore,


(UT)p=(UT)V=dUdT


and the desired result, CpCV=nR, immediately follows.


The "easy way" is described in a large number of textbooks, or web pages. I was even told to use it in one of my tutorials, at Oxford no less. It is not incorrect. However, I don't like the easy way, because it invokes the equipartition theorem, which (in my opinion) makes it only half a proof, unless one proves the equipartition theorem along with it.



In fact, you don't need to use equipartition to derive this result. The only thing that we need to use is pV=nRT. If you are not convinced: read on!




The hard way


Without invoking the equipartition theorem, we don't know that U=U(T). In general, we would expect U to be a function of all three variables: U=U(V,T,p). However, for an ideal gas, p itself is a function of (V,T): p(V,T)=nRT/V; so, we can eliminate the p-dependence of U, since the p-dependence is adequately described by the (V,T) dependence. The total differential for U=U(V,T) is


dU=(UV)TdV+(UT)VdT


Using a similar argument, we could also treat U as a function of p and T instead. The total differential for U=U(p,T) is


dU=(Up)Tdp+(UT)pdT


And the third total differential we need is that of V=V(p,T):


dV=(Vp)Tdp+(VT)pdT


Substituting (11) into (9), we have



dU=(UV)T[(Vp)Tdp+(VT)pdT]+(UT)VdT=[(UV)T(Vp)T]dp+[(UV)T(VT)p+(UT)V]dT


Equations (10) and (13) have very similar forms: they both look like dU=adp+bdT. We can equate the coefficients of dT in both equations to get


(UT)p=(UV)T(VT)p+(UT)V


and therefore, looking back to equation (6) and substituting equation (14) in, we see that


CpCV=(UT)p(UT)V+nR=(UV)T(VT)p+nR


The final step is that, for an ideal gas,


(UV)T=0


and the proof of this can be found in this question: Internal pressure of ideal gas. This yields


CpCV=nR


as desired.



No comments:

Post a Comment

readings - Appending 内 to a company name is read ない or うち?

For example, if I say マイクロソフト内のパートナーシップは強いです, is the 内 here read as うち or ない? Answer 「内」 in the form: 「Proper Noun + 内」 is always read 「ない...