Tuesday 2 June 2015

organic chemistry - Addition of HOBr across C=C



Source: Carey Advanced Organic Chemistry B, problem 4.1 b
Blockquote



Looking for interesting problems about addition to C=C, I came across this in the back of Carey. It looks like a simple addition across the alkene, but using HOBr which is something I've never came across in the lab (and perhaps not seen used as an example since I was an undergrad...).


The most obvious way to dissociate HOBr is to lose a proton, leaving the OBr anion behind, Wikipedia confirms this:



[...] hypobromous acid partially dissociates into the hypobromite anion OBr− and the cation H+.




So far so good. And based on this fact, you might expect the product to be as drawn below. However the original literature points towards a different product, also shown below.


enter image description here


Obviously, the product I've drawn as expected looks a little odd, with the unstable Br-O bond present. However, I cannot rationalise how the actual product has formed.



Ref.: JOC, 1968, 33, 3953.
The original literature from which the problem was taken


Blockquote



Three possibilities:





  1. The HOBr doesn't dissociate as I'd imagined. There is the possibility of the Br forming the bromonium ion which is then opened by hydroxide, however to get the product as isolated, you have to attack in the anti-Markovnikov sense (i.e. the product would look like the one formed if you'd attacked a primary carbocation with hydroxide).




  2. The product forms as I drew it, but rearranges to give the product they isolate. This is what I consider to be the most likely explanation, but I'm unable to see how this happens.




  3. The secondary carbocation forms upon protonation, but this rearranges. Again, struggling to see how this would work as the secondary cation is the most stable one that can form in this system, as there is no possibility of a tertiary carbocation.





Any suggestions to point in the right direction? Even the name of a rearrangement would be helpful.



Answer



The 'expected' product comes from analogy of addition of strong acids like HBr or acid (often sulfuric acid) catalyzed hydration. However, The pKa of HOBr is 8.7 (ref), much lower than those conditions, so it's not reasonable to make that analogy. Put another way, the base in those reactions is an alkene, which is very weak. Only a very strong acid will protonate an alkene.


In some quick SciFinder searching, I haven't found any overwhelmingly convincing evidence for the regioselectivity observed in the product, but it does seem reasonable to me by a mechanism similar to what Aditya Dev suggests.


Proposed mechanism


I look at HOBr as an oxygen with a leaving group (analogous to Br-Br). Attack by the alkene on the oxygen releases bromide and gives the tertiary carbocation. Kick back by the oxygen closes a protonated epoxide, which is analogous to the bromonium. In the bromonium case, these are considered resonance structures. I don't know if that's definitely the case here (oxygen is much smaller than bromine), but I've written it that way to continue the analogy. In any case, protonated epoxides are typically attacked at the site best able to stabilize positive charge, which is the tertiary carbon. The resulting bromohydrin is the 'observed' product.


No comments:

Post a Comment

readings - Appending 内 to a company name is read ない or うち?

For example, if I say マイクロソフト内のパートナーシップは強いです, is the 内 here read as うち or ない? Answer 「内」 in the form: 「Proper Noun + 内」 is always read 「ない...